Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 11, 2019No. A18-0918Published

1Opinion of the CourtSchellhas, Judge

Appellant challenges the postconviction court's summary denial of his petition to withdraw his guilty plea, arguing that his plea was involuntary because the state coerced his plea by threatening a sentence unauthorized by law. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Respondent State of Minnesota charged appellant Malcolm Johnson with second-degree controlled-substance crime after law enforcement stopped Johnson in his vehicle and found 6.2 grams of heroin in October 2013. The state notified Johnson in October 2013 of its intent to seek an aggravated sentence for Johnson as a career offender under Minn.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. RaleighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. State v. KuhlmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Dikken v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  5. Munt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API