Legal Opinion

Dikken v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 21, 2017No. A16-1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRAS, Justice.

This case requires us to determine whether an allegedly erroneous ruling by the district court entitles appellant Andrew Joseph Dikken to withdraw his guilty plea to first-degree-murder charges. Because the district court’s alleged error— the rejection of Dikken’s earlier unconditional guilty plea to second-degree-murder charges—does not give rise to a manifest injustice entitling Dikken to withdraw his plea, we affirm the postconviction court’s decision to deny relief without holding an evidentiary hearing.

FACTS

Dikken shot and killed two people, including his…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. RaleighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. State v. EckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. State v. GouletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. State v. NicholasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  3. Wayne v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  5. Lozoya v. City of CloquetDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API