Legal Opinion

Harman v. Ide

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 14, 1932No. 3 Div. 990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The matters involved on this appeal require a construction of those features of the school law relating to the right of appeal to the state superintendent of education. The state superintendent has construed the law to give him a discretion as to whether he would review, and in the exercise of that discretion he determined not to review., the matter. This is a mandamus sought from the courts requiring him to entertain the appeal, and determine the question submitted.

The Act of the Legislature of Alabama, approved August 25, 1927 (Acts 1927, p. 442), appropriated $900,000 annually as an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Independent Publishing Co. v. American Press Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Ex parte Louisville & Nashville R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Board of Education of Jefferson County v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Ex parte HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  5. Ex parte WattersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. A.R.C.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. City Board of Education of Athens v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. Tallapoosa County v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. In Re Opinions of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API