Legal Opinion

State v. Gant

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 29, 2002No. 2 CA-CR 2000-0430PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 After a jury trial, appellant Rodney Gant was found guilty of unlawful possession of cocaine for sale and unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent, mitigated prison terms, the longest of which was three years. Because we agree with Gant that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence, we reverse his convictions.

Standard of Review and Background

¶ 2 Gant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress a handgun and a plastic bag of cocaine found when his vehicle was…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. Harry ShololaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. SantiagoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. United States v. Elson Strahan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GantArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. DeanArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. GantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. State v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  5. State v. GantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API