Legal Opinion

State v. Dean

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 2003No. CR-02-0427-PRPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HURWITZ, Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review in this case to address a recurring Fourth Amendment issue — whether the search of an automobile is “incident” to the arrest of a defendant. In this case, the search occurred after the defendant was arrested in a house, some two and one-half hours after he had exited the vehicle. The superior court held that the search violated the Fourth Amendment; the court of appeals reversed. For the reasons below, we hold that the superior court correctly found that the search in this case did not fall within the “search incident to arrest” exception to the Fourth…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Thornton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. CaseresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. State v. GantArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State of Arizona v. Jahmari Ali ManuelArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. SpeerArizona Supreme Court · 2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API