Legal Opinion
State v. Gant
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 29, 2002No. 2 CA-CR 2000-0430Published
1Opinion of the Court
43 P.3d 188 (2002)
202 Ariz. 240
The STATE of Arizona, Appellee,
v.
Rodney Joseph GANT, Appellant.
No. 2 CA-CR 2000-0430.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.
March 29, 2002.
Janet Napolitano, Arizona Attorney General, by Randall M. Howe and Eric J. Olsson, Tucson for appellee.
Law Offices of Thomas Jacobs, by Thomas Jacobs, Tucson for appellant.
OPINION
BRAMMER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 After a jury trial, appellant Rodney Gant was found guilty of unlawful possession of cocaine for sale and unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent, mitigated…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Harry ShololaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Commonwealth v. SantiagoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- United States v. Elson Strahan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.