Legal Opinion

Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Weaver

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1984No. 211A83PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

The Court of Appeals remanded this case for a new trial based upon three errors in evidentiary rulings by the trial court having to do with the petitioner’s cross-examination of respondent Weaver and his expert witness, James E. Flynt, Jr., regarding the value of the property in question. Pursuant to Rules 14, 16, and 28 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, the petitioner included in its brief to this Court additional questions for review. Upon careful consideration of all the issues, we modify and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Petitioner’s first…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Kanoy v. HinshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Duke Power Co. v. WinebargerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Edmisten v. TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Donavant v. HudspethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Marley v. GraperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. City of Charlotte v. CombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. In re Proceedings for Condemnation of a Fee Simple Interest in Land Owned by LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API