Legal Opinion

In Re Apportionment of Delta County Board of Commissioners—1982

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1982No. Docket 61566PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Commencing with Mahan v Ho well 1 the United States Supreme Court distinguished dual constitutional standards in apportionment reviews. Congressional apportionment is governed by Art I, § 2 of the United States Constitution, and requires a good-faith effort to achieve absolute population equality in the drafting of congressional districts. On the other hand, legislative bodies within the states are governed by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment which permits more flexibility of the constitutional principle of equality among election districts.

The Court went on to hold:

"The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mahan v. HowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Connor v. FinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Apportionment of Ionia County Board of Commissioners-1972Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Apportionment of Wayne County Board of Commissioners—1982Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re Apportionment of Wayne County-2001Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Apportionment of Wayne County Board of Commissioners—1982Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API