Legal Opinion

Greer v. Greer

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 14, 1939No. Civ. 6097PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, J., pro tem.

In an action for divorce appellant was granted a divorce from respondent on her cross-complaint, and respondent was ordered to pay $70 per month for her support for a period of 12 months, and thereafter $60 per month.

A motion was made by respondent in May, 1935, asking modification of the decree, but this was denied. In June, 1936, a second such notice was made, on proper notice, and submitted after hearing and argument. On this hearing testimony was heard in behalf of both parties. O'n July 9, 1936, the trial court made the following order:

“The motion of the plaintiff and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McClure v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Connors v. SecordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hutton v. NewhouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Engleman v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Gebhardt v. GebhardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Atwell v. AtwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Jordan v. JordanIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Union Nat. Bank v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API