Legal Opinion

Union Nat. Bank v. Fox

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 21, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, J.

This suit was instituted by the Union National Bank to enforce collection of a check executed by W. C. Fox, payable to Will Tallent, dated March 13, 1936, for the sum of $475.91, to which a protest fee of $2.50 was added, making a total of $478.41, the Bank claiming to be an innocent holder for value of the check.

The suit originated in a justice of the peace court where judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff Bank against Fox for $478.41.

On the defendant’s appeal to the Circuit Court the case was tried by the judge without a jury.

The plaintiff filed before trial a written request for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tallent v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  2. Grizzard v. FiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Grace v. CurleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
  4. Elgin City Banking Co. v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Montlake Coal Co. v. Chattanooga Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Turvey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Mason Coal, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API