Legal Opinion
Gaulding v. Courts
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 7, 1954No. 35216PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
1. The single special ground of the motion for new trial assigns error upon the failure of the court to write out the possible verdicts in the case when requested by the jury so to do. Code § 110-103 provides as follows: “The judges of the superior courts shall, upon request of the jury, in the trial of all civil cases, furnish said jury with written instructions as to the form of their verdict.” After the jury had deliberated, they returned and the foreman of the jury requested that the verdicts be written but. In response to questions by the court, the foreman stated that they had agreed on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- First National Bank v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- McBride & Co. v. Macon Telegraph Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Rome Industrial Insurance v. EidsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Newton v. Gulf Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Whitner v. WhitnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Old Colony Insurance v. DresselCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Ramos-Barrientos v. BlandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Gordy Tire Co. v. BulmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- APCOA, Inc. v. Fidelity National BankDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.