T.O.F.C., Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
In this case plaintiff claims that it is entitled to compensation from defendant upon the ground either of an express or implied contract with defendant or of a taking which falls within the purview of the fifth amendment. We hold *183that any contract claim that plaintiff has must be against the Consolidated Railroad Corporation (Conrail), an entity over which we have no jurisdiction. We further hold that the actions of defendant did not result in a taking of plaintiffs property which is compensable under the fifth amendment.
Plaintiffs claims concern a September 27, 1960, contract between…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Omnia Commercial Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Butz Engineering Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- A & D Auto Sales, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Singleton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Kaiser Development Co. v. City & County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1986
- Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Consol. Rail Corp. v. Metro-North Commuter R. Co.Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.