Legal Opinion
JB v. ASARCO, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 2, 2004No. Nos. 03-CV-498-H(C), 03-CV-565-H to 03-CV-567-H, 03-CV-569-HPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CLEARY, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter came before the undersigned on November 1, 2004, for hearing on the Motion to Compel Production of Documents [Dkt. # 171] filed by Defendants ASARCO Incorporated (“ASARCO”), Blue Tee Corp., Doe Run Resources, Inc., and Gold Fields Mining Corporation (hereafter, referred to jointly as “Defendants”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
Background
These actions originally involved 26 Plaintiffs making identical allegations that they suffered personal injuries caused by exposure to lead resulting…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. GmeinderDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Monica W. v. MilevoiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Lamonds v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1998
- Anderson v. SeigelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Salkey v. MottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Colindres v. Quietflex ManufacturingDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2005