Legal Opinion

Salkey v. Mott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 24, 1997PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated August 9, 1996, as granted those branches of the cross motion of the defendants Arthur T. Mott and Dorothy Mott which were to compel the plaintiff Car line Lennon to submit to an intelligence quotient test and provide authorizations to enable the defendants to obtain her academic and employment records, and the defendants Arthur T. Mott and Dorothy Mott cross-appeal from stated portions of the same order.

O…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re U. S. Pioneer Electronics Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Kaplan v. HerbsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Cardiomax, Inc. v. GustafsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Anderson v. SeigelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Van Epps v. County of AlbanyNew York Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API