Legal Opinion

Ormerod v. Dearman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1882PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the Oourt of Common Pleas of Tioga Coimty: Of January Term, 1882, No. 142. Feigned issue, wherein Albert Dearman, administrator of Justus Dearmau, deceased, was plaintiff, and Jolm Ormerod, defendant, to try the question, what amount, if anything, was due on a certain judgment for $1,775, entered on a judgment note given by defendant to said Justus Dearman, which judgment hud been opened by the court, and tlie defendant let into a defence.

Read the full summary

Error to the Oourt of Common Pleas of Tioga Coimty: Of January Term, 1882, No. 142. Feigned issue, wherein Albert Dearman, administrator of Justus Dearmau, deceased, was plaintiff, and Jolm Ormerod, defendant, to try the question, what amount, if anything, was due on a certain judgment for $1,775, entered on a judgment note given by defendant to said Justus Dearman, which judgment hud been opened by the court, and tlie defendant let into a defence. On the trial before Williams, P. J., the following facts appeared: Tlie defendant, Ormerod, an attorney-at law, was for some years the friend and…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Paxson

The learned judge of the court bélow in afiirming the plaintiff’s fifth point withdrew the case from the jury. . The said point is as follows: “That the eharge against J. Dearman proposed to be settled by the alleged contract constituted a criminal offense against the law, and therefore not susceptible of settlement. The most that could be accomplished in such a case would be to induce the prosecutor not to appear and prosecute, and the alleged agreement in this ease to pay for such services is void, as being against the policy of the law, and cannot be enforced, and the plaintiff is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clippinger v. HepbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  2. Hatzfield v. GuldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kuhn v. BuhlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Waychoff v. WaychoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Rhinehart v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1917
  4. Spalding v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Kelly v. BellCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API