Rhinehart v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
In Equity. Bill by Bentley L,. Rhinehart against the Victor Talking Machine Company. On motion to strike'supplemental bill, filed by intervener, Robert F. Gibson.
1Opinion of the Court
HAIGHT, District Judge.
This is a motion to strike out the pleading filed by the intervener, pursuant to the permission granted by the order of this court, made on the 19th day of February, 1917. The defendant has assigned 24 reasons why it should be stricken out. Many of them are, however, merely reiterations of others, expressed differently. They present several questions, which will be separately discussed.
[1-6] 1. The intervener bases his right to intervene on rule 37 of the Supreme Court (198 Fed. xxviii, 115 C. C. A. xxviii), alleging that he has an interest in the litigation between the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Barnes v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Ingersoll v. CoramSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- McGowan v. ParishSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Clark v. Sandusky Appeal of De RoseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Whittaker v. Brictson Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Lone Star Cement Corporation v. SwartwoutCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Leaver v. K. & L. Box & Lumber Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.