Legal Opinion

Spalding v. Ewing

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1892No. Appeal, No. 288PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal, No. 288, Jan. T., 1891, by defendant, Washington Ewing, from judgment of C. P. Chester Co., on verdict for plaintiff, Harvey Spalding. Assumpsit on appeal from judgment of justice of the peace to recover amount claimed for services performed, under written contract signed by defendant.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 288, Jan. T., 1891, by defendant, Washington Ewing, from judgment of C. P. Chester Co., on verdict for plaintiff, Harvey Spalding. Assumpsit on appeal from judgment of justice of the peace to recover amount claimed for services performed, under written contract signed by defendant. On the trial before Waddell, P. J., it appeared by the evidence that defendant had received a post-office department warrant for $94.57, dated Jan. 28,1889. The warrant was not received through the plaintiff. The verdict was for the plaintiff in the sum of $26.06. The other facts appear by the opinion…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sterrett,

This action, to recover fees alleged to have been earned by plaintiff, is founded on the following contract signed by defendant :

“ Landenberg, Pa., .1882. I here guarantee that .myself, claimant for additional pay as postmaster (at Chandlersville, Landenberg), shall, without delay, upon the receipt of draft for amount which may be collected, remit the amount of fee due his attorney, Henry Spalding, which is understood to be twenty-five per cent, of collection, to the said Henry Spalding, at Washington, D. C.”

The character of the services rendered in pursuance…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  4. Woodstock Iron Co. v. Richmond & Danville Extension Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Clippinger v. HepbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Peyton v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Kaufman v. CatzenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Edmund v. Browne v. R & R Engineering Co., a Corporation of the State of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  4. Houlton v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Spayd v. Ringing Rock LodgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API