Application of David G. Braithwaite
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1ConcurrenceSmith, Judge
The record shows that the Board of Appeals here consisted of an examiner-in-chief and two acting examiners-in-chief. Appellants do not challenge the legality of that board. For the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in In re Wiechert, 370 F.2d 927, 54 CCPA 957, it is my view that the decision of such a board is a legal nullity. However, I accept here the majority’s view *602on this issue in the Wiechert case, that is, the legality of the board is not an issue here. I therefore participate in the merits of this appeal and in so doing, agree with the conclusion of the majority.
Turning to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Application of Rudolf WiechertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Max O. RobesonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Christian Zickendraht and Arthur BuehlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.