Legal Opinion

Langston v. Louisville & N. R.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 29, 1926No. 6 Div. 387PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition is for mandamus to a judge of the circuit court.

The right of review by appellate court is declared to be by certiorari. Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford, 206 Ala. 447, 90 So. 803. The right of “appeal” is declared by the decisions to he statutory (Lewis v. Martin, 210 Ala. 401, 98 So. 635); that is to say, in Ex parte Tillman (Ala. Sup.) 108 So. 62, 1 it was declared that the effect of Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford, supra, was that the right of appeal was a part of the remedy (Poull Co. v. Foy-Hays Const. Co., 159 Ala. 458, 48 So. 785), and that the Legislature can limit, restrict,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Shipp v. SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Ex parte Louisville & Nashville R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Wynn v. McCraneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stallings v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Exchange Distributing Co. v. OslinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Webb v. FrenchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Gandy v. HaglerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Hearn v. United States Cast Iron Pipe & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API