Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Folsom

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1893No. 1381PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the State of Nevada, Ormsby county. Bichard Bising, District Judge. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. I. If the presentation of the claim to the attorney of the estate be held to be a presentation authorized by law, it was barred before suit was commenced. It was handed to the attorney on August 14, 1891, and ten days expired ou August 24, 1891, without the claim having been acted upon and it became rejected under the statute.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of the State of Nevada, Ormsby county. Bichard Bising, District Judge. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. I. If the presentation of the claim to the attorney of the estate be held to be a presentation authorized by law, it was barred before suit was commenced. It was handed to the attorney on August 14, 1891, and ten days expired ou August 24, 1891, without the claim having been acted upon and it became rejected under the statute. Suit was brought on January 5, 1892, more than three months after the claim was rejected. The suit cannot be maintained…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Bigelow, J.:

The only question necessary to be considered in this case is that concerning- the presentation of the plaintiff’s claim to the executrix. The record shows that on April 20, 1891, she duly published a notice requiring- “ all persons having claims against the said deceased to exhibit them, with the necessary vouchers, within four months after the first publication of this notice, to the said executrix, at the residence of John G. Fox, in Carson City, Ormsby county, Nevada. Dated April 20,1891.” [Signed] “ Ellen M. Stevenson, Executrix of the estate of C. C. Stevenson,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jones' Executors v. LightfootSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  2. Lucich v. MedinNevada Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Perkins v. OnyettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Farris v. StoutzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  5. Pfeiffer v. SussSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of M. D. FoleyNevada Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Roche Valley Land Co. v. BarthMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Keith v. WintersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Kohler-McLister Paint Co. v. RaffertyWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Torreyson v. BowmanNevada Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API