Legal Opinion

Maskell v. Spokane Cycle & Auto Supply Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1918No. 14264PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Oswald, J., entered March 27, 1917, in favor of the garnishee defendants, after a trial before the court upon an agreed statement of facts.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Appellant instituted garnishment proceedings against respondents, averring that the assignor of appellant was a creditor of the defendants Alexander; that, at a time when he was such, they transferred a stock of goods to the respondent corporation and failed to comply with the bulk sales law, and that the individual respondent holds the stock of goods as a common law assignee for the benefit of the corporation’s creditors.

The facts are stipulated as follows: J. D. Alexander was engaged in the bicycle and motorcycle business in Spokane. On September 6,1914, William Mas*17kell received personal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Kasper v. Spokane Merchants' Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Kingman & Co. v. MowryIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Maskell v. AlexanderWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Coaldale Coal Co. v. State Bank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schoeppel v. PfannensteilSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. Norris v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. McLean v. Miller Robinson Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. First Nat. Bank of Durham v. Raleigh Sav. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  5. In re Rosenberg's Account, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API