Pahn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE WOLFSON
delivered the opinion of the court:
The question we are asked to resolve is whether an insurance company is entitled to enforce a provision of its policy that prohibits recovery of underinsured motorist benefits (UIM) when uninsured motorist benefits (UM) have been recovered for the same accident and on the same policy by the same person.
Plaintiff Young Pahn brought a declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that she was entitled to recover UIM benefits in addition to the UM benefits she was awarded under a policy of insurance issued by State Farm Mutual…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Menke v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Bruder v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Hoglund v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Grzeszczak v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. ElkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. HindeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. TrujilloAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Terrence Domin v. Shelby InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. MartinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Garcia v. GutierrezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.