Bissette v. Auto-Owners Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Judge.
At issue is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff because there were genuine issues of material fact regarding (1) Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company’s (“Auto-Owners”) duty to defend, indemnify, or cover Bryan Keith Cothran (“Cothran”), 1 and (2) the impact on Auto-Owners’ duty to defend, indemnify, or cover Cothran in light of Cothran’s failure to cooperate in his defense. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
I. Procedural History and Evidence •
Craig A. Cleveland (“Cleveland”), owner and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- In Re Appeal of the Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- State Capital Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. Buzz Off Insect Shield, L.L.C.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. PaulCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- PENN NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. PIZZA, INCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2020