State v. Paul
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Elmore, Judge.
Defendant appeals from a judgment entered on resentencing pursuant to this Court’s decision in State v. Paul, _ N.C. App. _, 736 S.E.2d 649 (2013) (unpublished) (Paul I). Defendant raises as error the trial court’s determination that he was a prior record level IV offender (PRL IV). After careful consideration, we conclude that the trial court did not err, and we affirm the judgment.
*449I. Facts
On 5 November 2007, defendant pled guilty to sale of a schedule II controlled substance as a habitual felon. At defendant’s sentencing hearing in 2007, the trial court found that defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. BohlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. DayeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bank of America, N.A. v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. SpenceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. HaizlipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. KelliherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.