Legal Opinion

State v. Paul

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 2013No. COA13-717PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Elmore, Judge.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered on resentencing pursuant to this Court’s decision in State v. Paul, _ N.C. App. _, 736 S.E.2d 649 (2013) (unpublished) (Paul I). Defendant raises as error the trial court’s determination that he was a prior record level IV offender (PRL IV). After careful consideration, we conclude that the trial court did not err, and we affirm the judgment.

*449I. Facts

On 5 November 2007, defendant pled guilty to sale of a schedule II controlled substance as a habitual felon. At defendant’s sentencing hearing in 2007, the trial court found that defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BohlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. DayeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bank of America, N.A. v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. SpenceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. HaizlipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. KelliherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API