Legal Opinion

Loftis v. State Ex Rel. Eyman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 2, 1966No. 2 CA-HC 36PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

William T. Loftis has applied to this court for a writ of habeas corpus directed to the respondent to show cause why he should not be discharged from custody, claiming his detention is illegal in that his constitutional rights were violated.

He alleges that he was denied the constitutional guarantees of right to assistance of counsel, and equal protection of the laws and further was deprived of his liberty without due process of law. His allegations are predicated on the fact that certain statements made by him to police officers during custodial interrogation were admitted into…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States Ex Rel. Feeley v. RagenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  5. Lowell Lyons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bean v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. StreettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. State v. CufioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. State v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Bean v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API