State v. Policao
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPieper, J.
This appeal arises out of four separate orders for bond. estreatment. On appeal, Appellants A AAA Bail Bonds, American Surety, and Bankers Insurance (collectively “Appellants”) argue that: (1) the. trial court abused its discretion by' ignoring the clear and unambiguous language of South Carolina Code section 17-15-170 (Supp.2012) and ordering es-treatment; (2) the trial court’s orders of estreatment are based upon errors of law; (3) the State’s efforts to estreat the bonds are barred by the equitable doctrine of laches; and (4) the trial court abused its discretion by failing to consider the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Historic Charleston Holdings, LLC v. MallonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- State v. BurtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Pride v. AndersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021