Legal Opinion

State v. Policao

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 20, 2013No. Appellate Case No.2011-194306; No. 5100PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPieper, J.

This appeal arises out of four separate orders for bond. estreatment. On appeal, Appellants A AAA Bail Bonds, American Surety, and Bankers Insurance (collectively “Appellants”) argue that: (1) the. trial court abused its discretion by' ignoring the clear and unambiguous language of South Carolina Code section 17-15-170 (Supp.2012) and ordering es-treatment; (2) the trial court’s orders of estreatment are based upon errors of law; (3) the State’s efforts to estreat the bonds are barred by the equitable doctrine of laches; and (4) the trial court abused its discretion by failing to consider the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  3. Historic Charleston Holdings, LLC v. MallonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. BurtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Pride v. AndersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API