Legal Opinion
Fund for Animals v. Babbitt
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided October 8, 1997No. Civ. 1:94CV301PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(papers 57, 74 and 78)
MURTHA, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs, which include several individuals and environmental groups, challenge the federal government’s alleged failure to evaluate adequately the environmental consequences of Vermont’s annual moose hunt as required by the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. (hereinafter “NEPA”). Having completed adequate discovery on all outstanding issues 1 , the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Black v. LahoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Sierra Club v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
- Friends of Pioneer Street Bridge Corp. v. Federal Highway AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2001
- Touret v. National Aeronautics & Space AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2007