Legal Opinion

St. Louis, Jacksonville & Chicago Railroad v. Lurton

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cass county; the Hon. Cyrus Epler, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This action was brought on an agreement in substance as follows: In consideration of appellees releasing unto the Jacksonville, Alton and St. Louis Railroad Company the right of way, and not prosecuting a suit pending in the Morgan circuit court for damages for right of way over lots in Lurton & Kidzie’s addition to Jacksonville, the company agreed, within twelve months after its road should be completed and opened for use, to construct a good bridge over its road on the line of lots 4 and 5. in block 11, in that addition, or, if found desirable, the company to have the privilege of grading…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ardizonne v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Taylor v. North Pacific Coast RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Cincinnati Southern Railway Co. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  4. Cleopatra Mining Co. v. DickinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API