Legal Opinion

Cleopatra Mining Co. v. Dickinson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1902No. 3986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. William R. Bell, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, C.

J. — Action for damages alleged to have been sustained by breach of contract between respondent, as lessor, and appellants, as lessees, of mining property in King county. The material stipulations of the contract are as follows:

“1. That said lessor hereby leases, demises and delivers over to said lessees the possession of all the property, including quartz mining claims, owned by said lessor on and near Miller river, in King county, Washington, with surface ground, dump, tramways, water rights, mill sites, tunnel openings, tunnel sites and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . SEC. Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Cochran v. PewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co. v. PryorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  4. Taylor v. North Pacific Coast RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Logansport, Crawfordsville & Southwestern Railway Co. v. WrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reed v. Consolidated Feldspar Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API