Legal Opinion

Holland Texas Hypotheek Bank v. Broocks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1924No. 1174. [fn*]PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

On the 20th day of November, 1916, appellees, John H. Broocks and wife, executed a deed of trust in favor of appellant to secure it in an indebtedness of $10,000, containing tlie following terms, conditions, agreements, stipulations, and remedies :

“It is understood and agreed that this deed of trust shall also he security for any other and additional indebtedness which the parties of the first part may 'owe the party of the third part at the date of the maturity, of the note or notes herein secured, and all said additional indebtedness shall be payable at Port Arthur, Tex., and bear interest…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ludington v. PattonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Benskin v. BarksdaleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Easton v. SomervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Stinson v. SneedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Babcock, Cornish & Co. v. UrquhartWashington Supreme Court · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. CarteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Nelson v. SeidelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Bradley v. Straus-Frank CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Moseley v. FikesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Coffman v. BrannenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API