Legal Opinion

State v. Castañeda

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1994No. 20170PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

By this appeal, we are asked to determine whether Idaho’s double punishment statute, I.C. § 18-301, barred prosecution of Fidelmiro Vargas Castañeda for felony DUI when he had previously pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge for fleeing an officer, where the two charges stemmed from a common sequence of events. We conclude that the DUI charge was predicated upon different acts than the charge for fleeing an officer, and therefore, prosecution for both offenses was not proscribed.

On the evening of January 29,1992, Officer Tony Chapa of the Cassia County Sheriffs office observed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. McCormickIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. HornIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. RandlesIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CastanedaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API