Legal Opinion
State v. Castaneda
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided January 27, 1994No. 20170PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
869 P.2d 234 (1994)
125 Idaho 234
STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Fidelmiro Vargas CASTAÑEDA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 20170.
Court of Appeals of Idaho.
January 27, 1994.
Raymundo G. Pena, Rupert, argued for defendant-appellant.
Larry EchoHawk, Atty. Gen.; Michael A. Henderson, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent. Michael A. Henderson argued.
LANSING, Judge.
By this appeal, we are asked to determine whether Idaho's double punishment statute, I.C. § 18-301, barred prosecution of Fidelmiro Vargas Castañeda for felony DUI when he had previously pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. McCormickIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. HornIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. RandlesIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LynchIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BettertonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. LongstreetIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BryanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. LynchIdaho Supreme Court · 1994