Pacific Bank v. Mixter
Supreme Court of the United States
IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. . This was a motion to dismiss a writ of error for reasons stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Me. Chief Justice "Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
Under § 1001 of the Revised Statutes no bond for the prosecution of the suit, or to answer in damages or costs, is required on writs of error or appeals issuing from or brought to this court by direction of the Comptroller of the Currency in suits by or against insolvent national banks, or the receivers thereof. This is such a case.
There is abundant evidence in the record that the direction from the comptroller to the receiver was to take out a writ of error in this case, although, by mistake in one of the papers, Henry Mixter was'…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Gibson v. PetersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- C.H. Sanders Co. v. BHAP Housing Development Fund Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- Citizens' Bank of Wichita v. FarwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Walton v. Marietta Chair Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. WellerSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.