Sea River Properties, LLC v. Parks
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
Plaintiff Sea River and defendant Parks own adjoining parcels of land on the central Oregon coast near Nedonna Beach just south of the Nehalem River. Between the 1920s and the 1990s, after the United States government built two jetties to contain the Nehalem River, the ocean and wind deposited sand and silt onto the upland, creating approximately 40 acres of land west of those lots and south of the Nehalem River’s southern jetty. The primary issue in this case is who owns those 40 acres (the “disputed property”). Plaintiff filed this action to quiet title to the disputed property, arguing…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hughes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- St. Louis v. RutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Heard v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Hoffman v. Freeman Land and Timber, LLC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wels v. HippeOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Hammond v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Botofan-Miller v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- Morris v. KanneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Esquire Investments, Inc. v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.