Legal Opinion
Arjun SINGH, Appellant, v. Anthony J. BRAKE, Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 4, 2000No. 99-1259PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE. Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA.
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Arjun Singh appeals from the judgment of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences awarding priority of invention to Anthony J. Brake. See Singh v. Brake, Paper No. 164 (BPAI May 11, 1998). Because certain of the Board’s key findings underlying its conclusion that Singh failed to prove conception of the subject matter of the interference prior to the effective filing date of Brake were unsupported by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Invitrogen Corp. (Formerly Known as Life Technologies, Inc.) v. Clontech Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Martek Biosciences Corp. v. Nutrinova, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Sandt Technology, Ltd. v. Resco Metal and Plastics Corporation (Also Known as Resco Metal Products Corp.) and Seven Ocean Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Taurus IP, LLC v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.