In Re James T. Hamilton
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the July 26, 1988, decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (board) on Hamilton’s patent application for a business form. The board sustained the examiner’s rejection of six claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) on the ground that the claimed business forms having horizontal perforations were on sale more than one year before Hamilton filed his application. The board reversed the examiner’s rejection under § 102(b) of the remaining claims to business forms having vertical perforations, but made a new rejection…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- In Re James A. Smith and James H. McLaughlin and Sterling Drug, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Tp Laboratories, Inc. v. Professional Positioners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- TP Laboratories, Inc. v. Professional Positioners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- J.A. Laporte, Inc. v. Norfolk Dredging CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc. v. Klm Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Baxter International, Inc. And Baxter Healthcare Corporation v. Cobe Laboratories, Inc. And Cobe Bct, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Steven G. Lough v. Brunswick Corporation, D/B/A Mercury MarineCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Petrolite Corporation v. Baker Hughes Incorporated and Baker Performance Chemicals IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Atlanta Attachment Co. v. Leggett & Platt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.