Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. v. Succession of Cancienne
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Twenty-Seventh Judicial District Court, Parish of Assumption; Charles T. Wortham, Judge. Action by the Hibernia Bank & Trust Company against the Succession of Leo Cancienne. Judgment for plaintiff, and the administratrix of the succession appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.
The administratrix of the succession of Leo Cancienne has appealed from a judgment rendered against the succession ,for the sum of $15,000, with legal interest from judicial demand.
The suit was upon two written instruments dated, respectively, the 16th of August, 1911, and the 23d of Septembeir, 1911, signed by Leo Cancienne, for $7,500 each, purporting to guarantee the payment of any indebtedness to that amount due or to become due to the Hibernia Bank & Trust Company by the Sugar Planters’ Storage & Distributing Company. The instruments, being on printed forms furnished by the bank, are…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Jackson v. LudelingSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Douglass and Others v. Reynolds and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Davis Sewing MacHine Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Louisiana Bank and Trust Co., Crowley v. BoutteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Usx Corporation v. B.J. Tanenbaum, Jr. And Ted TanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Hoyt v. HampeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Bonura v. Christiana Bros. Poultry Co. of Gretna, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- McGowan v. Wells' TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.