Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cowan v. . Roberts

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 22, 1904PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1DissentMontgomery, J.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $2,000, alleged to be due by the defendant on a guaranty. The firm of Roberts Bros., on 9 April, 1899, was indebted to the plaintiffs, who were merchants, in the sum of $1,742.60, for goods theretofore sold and delivered, and were desirous of making further purchases, but the plaintiffs refused to sell any other goods to them unless they would secure by a guaranty their then existing indebtedness and any other amount that might become due for future sales. Roberts Bros. then requested the defendant to give the (416) required guaranty for them, so…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Union Bank v. . Coster's ExecutorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. City Nat'l Bank of Poughkeepsie v. . PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. State Ex Rel . Barnes v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  4. Jones v. . AshfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. Straus, Hartman, Hofflin & Co. v. BeardsleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. O'Grady v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. CreasySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Gillespie v. DeWittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. CreasySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API