Zickgraf Enterprises, Inc. v. Yonce
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Defendants argue but one issue from the trial judge’s denial of their motion for summary judgment. They contend that summary judgment should have been granted as a matter of law because plaintiff is a first-tier subcontractor claiming rights from the owners of property through subrogation under an unlicensed general contractor.
As a general rule, an order which denies a motion for summary judgment is not appealable. Hill v. Smith, 38 N.C. App. 625, 248 S.E. 2d 455 (1978). However, in our discretion we have chosen to review the trial judge’s order because of the significance of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bryan Builders Supply v. MidyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Hill v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Helms v. DawkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Revis Sand & Stone, Inc. v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martin Architectural Products, Inc. v. Meridian Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Jones Cooling & Heating, Inc. v. BoothCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Ron Medlin Construction v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Signature Development, LLC v. Sandler Commercial at Union, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Paving Equipment of Carolina, Inc. v. Lake Providence Properties, Inc. (In Re Lake Providence Properties, Inc.)District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.