Legal Opinion

Luginbuhl v. Hemond, No. Cv 96 61232 S (Feb. 10, 1997)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 10, 1997No. CV 96 61232 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION This is an action brought in three counts, for breach of contract, note collection and unjust enrichment. Plaintiffs allege that they entered into an agreement to sell to the defendants a business known as Quintree Stables and the real estate on which it is located, and that the defendants have breached the agreement by, inter-alia, failing to make monthly occupancy payments, failing to operate Quintree Stables in a business like manner and failing to diligently pursue financing so that the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Mead v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Quimby v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API