Legal Opinion

Nash v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 26, 2010No. 1619, September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraeff, J.

On August 12, 2008, Floyd Reynaldo Nash, appellant, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Charles County of possession of a regulated firearm by a person previously convicted of a crime of violence. The court sentenced appellant to five years without parole.

Appellant presents two questions on appeal, which we have rephrased:

1. Did the trial court err in bifurcating the elements of the offense, with the jury considering only whether appellant possessed a regulated firearm?

2. Was the evidence sufficient to support appellant’s conviction?

For the reasons set forth below, we shall affirm the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Klauenberg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. United States v. TavaresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Wimbish v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. State v. NewtonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Hemming v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API