Legal Opinion

Gutfreund v. East River National Bank

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1929PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.

The case comes before us on an action to recover damages for the payment of nine fotged and altered checks, out of thirty-nine of like purport originally sued on. These nine are the later checks of a series covering a period of about one year and three months. The earliest is dated September 11, 1923; the latest January 22, 1924. Plaintiffs have had judgment thereon with interest for $2,183.48.

The facts out of which the litigation arises are as follows: Plaintiffs conducted a wholesale and retail meat market as partners under the firm name and style of Gutfreund’s Olympia Market. They bought…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Critten v. Chemical National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. National Exchange Bank v. LesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Bank of British North America v. Merchants' National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Gallo v. . Brooklyn Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Land Title Bank & Trust Co. v. Cheltenham National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. National Surety Co. v. President & Directors of the Manhattan Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Home Indemnity Co. v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  4. Stella Flour & Feed Corp. v. National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  5. Parent Teacher Ass'n v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API