Kenilworth Insurance v. Chamberlain
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills
The issue here presented appears to be one of first impression in Illinois: whether an “operator’s policy” of insurance excluding coverage when the motor vehicle is owned by the insured can be construed as to afford or include such liability coverage by virtue of the Financial Responsibility Law of Illinois. A declaratory judgment action was brought to resolve this question; both sides moved for summary judgment, and appellees prevailed. The sole point of error is whether tire trial court granted summary judgment to the proper party.
Although relatively unimportant to the understanding of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Reserve Insurance Company v. StaatsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- George W. Booth v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Meyer v. Aetna Cas. Ins. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- Kyle v. McCARRONSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rivota v. KaplanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. HitchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Occidental Fire & Casualty Co. of North Carolina v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Metro Inter-Insurance v. AnthonyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971