Legal Opinion

Workman v. Vader

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1993No. 18497PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Judge.

The plaintiffs, Mary Workman and Edward Workman, her husband, appeal after the trial court sustained defendant Linda Vader’s motion to dismiss their common law claims. The plaintiffs’ claims are for Mary’s personal injuries and Edward’s loss, of consortium alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant, a co-employee of Mary.

We reverse and remand.

FACTS

In Count I of the petition, Mary seeks damages from the defendant for injuries she sustained at a Wal-Mart store, her place of employment. She alleges that she was hired by Wal-Mart to work in its jewelry department;…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Badami v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Magee v. Blue Ridge Professional Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. Detling v. EdelbrockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  5. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hansen v. RitterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Sexton v. Jenkins & Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Leeper v. AsmusMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Parrott v. HQ, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Garrity v. ManningSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API