Legal Opinion
Platt v. Havens
California Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1897No. S. F. No. 729PublishedCited by 11 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SEARLS, C.
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court in and for the city and county of San Francisco in favor of plaintiff for $2,628.85, upon a promissory note made by defendant for $2,500, bearing interest after maturity at eight per cent per annum, and dated August 21, 1894. Accompanying the note rvas an agreement executed by the patties of which the following is a copy:
“Agreement.
“This agreement, made by and between H. B. Havens and A. G. Platt, both of San Francisco, Cal., witnesseth:
“That the said H. B. Havens hereby sells to said A. G. Platt twelve thousand five hundred (12,500)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Swasey v. AdairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Biggs v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Smith v. PollockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by11 opinions
- Parker v. James Granger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Glogau v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Gardner v. ShreveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. Metropolitan Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- De Castro v. RoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.