Legal Opinion
Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Flakt, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 3, 1991No. Civ. A. 89-533-JJFPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Joy Technologies, Inc., (“Joy”), filed the instant patent infringement action against defendant Flakt, Inc. (“Flakt”) on September, 28, 1989, for infringement of Patent No. 4,279,873 (“the ’873 patent”), entitled “Process for Flue Gas Desulfurization.”
Flakt filed a Motion to Dismiss on April 2, 1990, a Motion for Separate Trials and a Stay of Discovery on July 18, 1990, a Motion for a Protective Order Staying Discovery (pertaining to evidence on damages until the Motion for Separate Trials is resolved) on July 18,1990, and a Motion for a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Willemijn Houdstermaatschaapij BV v. Apollo Computer Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- Lis v. Robert Packer HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Sheldon v. West Bend Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- Laitram Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
- Murata Manufacturing Co. v. Bel Fuse, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Senorx, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. v. Rexam Beverage Can Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
- Hunter Douglas, Inc. v. Comfortex Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.