Legal Opinion

Beadling v. Sirotta

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 2, 1964PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pbootok, J.

The plaintiff, George Beadling, seeks'damages from Dr. E. Bernard Sirotta, a radiologist, for injuries and losses sustained as the result of an allegedly negligent diagnosis and report made by the doctor respecting the health of the plaintiff. He also seeks damages from Samuel M. Lang-ston Company on the theory of respondeat superior, contending that Dr. Sirotta was the agent of Langston in making the diagnosis and report.

This case is before us for the second time. In Beadling v. Sirotta, 39 N. J. 34 (1962), we vacated an order of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beadling v. E. Bernard Sirotta & Samuel M. Langston Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. Beadling v. SirottaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bratt v. International Business MacHines Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Harris v. KreutzerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  3. Greenberg v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Hoover v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. George J. Daly, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API