Legal Opinion

Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing & Section 4(D) Rule Litigation-MDL No. 1993 v. Jewell

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 18, 2013No. 11-5353PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

After listing the polar bear as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, acting pursuant to a related statute— the Marine Mammal Protection Act— barred the importation of polar bear trophies. Hunters and hunting organizations challenge this determination, raising both statutory and procedural arguments. Finding them all without merit, the district court granted summary judgment to the Service. We affirm.

I

“[T]he largest of the living bear species,” polar bears are…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Export-Import Bank of the United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. NACS v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  3. Abraxis Bioscience, LLC v. KapposDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Georgia Aquarium, Inc. v. PritzkerDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
  5. Center for Biological Diversity v. RossDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API