Legal Opinion
United States v. 62 PACKAGES, ETC.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 4, 1944No. 8357PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Claimant seeks to reverse a judgment condemning “Marmola” drug tablets entered in a proceeding under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, c. 675, 52 Stat. 1040, 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. The essential averments of the libel were that the tablets were misbranded in that (1) when used as prescribed they are dangerous to health; (2) they are falsely represented to be a safe and appropriate remedy for obesity; and, (3) the instructions for use fail to reveal facts material with respect to the consequences which may arise upon the use of the drug as prescribed, thus…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Lexington Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Sauder v. DittmarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. State Street Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
- Wertz v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Stork v. TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. El-O-Pathic Pharmacy United States v. Hudson Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Research Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- United States v. Article . Consisting of 216Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. OlsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- United States v. 30 Cases, More or Less, Leader Brand Strawberry Fruit SpreadDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.