Flickinger v. Wanczyk
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this action seek damages for the wrongful birth/life of the minor plaintiff, Sara Mae Flickinger, who was bom suffering from spinabifida. In addition, plaintiffs seek damages under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 for the deprivation of their right under Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973), to make a timely and informed decision as to whether to terminate the pregnancy. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. On May 14, 1993 we denied defendants SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc. and SmithKline…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fobian v. Storage Technology Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997