Legal Opinion

Flickinger v. Wanczyk

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-CV-1867PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this action seek damages for the wrongful birth/life of the minor plaintiff, Sara Mae Flickinger, who was bom suffering from spinabifida. In addition, plaintiffs seek damages under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 for the deprivation of their right under Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973), to make a timely and informed decision as to whether to terminate the pregnancy. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. On May 14, 1993 we denied defendants SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc. and SmithKline…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fobian v. Storage Technology Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API